India Consumer Forum for online consumer complaints - Part 1321

Educational Institutions cannot forfeit the fees or advance

It has been found that District Consumer Forum in Delhi and the State Commission, Delhi has been taking consistent view that tutorials are bound to refund the fees when their services have not been availed. To illustrate the point, in Case No.292/09, DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST) reproduced in its Order the extract from Judgement …

Continue reading

Meru Cabs, Mumbai ordered to pay compensation

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE (COLLECTOR OFFICE, ROOM NO. 214, IIND FLOOR, THANE) Complaint No. :- 268/2010 Filed on :- 19/07/2010 / Decided on :- 2 /12/2011 Shri Amit Chintamani Vartak, Thane (w) 400 602. .. Complainant V/s. Managing Director, Meru Cabs Co. Pvt. Ltd. Malad (w), Mumbai 400064 ..Opponent This complaint was filed by the Complainant against the …

Continue reading

Hotel ordered to pay compensation for charging more than MRP

— NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 550 OF 2006 (Against the order dated 09.01.2006 in Appeal No. 974 of 2005 of the Gujarat State Commission, Ahmedabad) Hotel Nyay Mandir…..(Petitioner/Opp. Party No.1) National Highway No.8 Zadeshwar Road Bharuch Versus Ishwar Lal Jinabhai Desai….. (Respondent/Complainant) 79, Ami Adarsh Society Athwa Lanes Surat …

Continue reading

National Commission deplores HDFC’s strong-arm tactics

In HDFC Bank Vs. Balwinder Singh [III (2009) CPJ 40 (NC)] Date of decision: 16.03.2009, the National Commission has strongly condemned the banks for employing musclemen and recovery agent to take forcible repossession of hypothecated vehicle from the customer. In the instant Complaintant Mr. Balwinder Singh had complained against HDFC bank of employing musclemen and …

Continue reading

Arbitration Clause and Consumer Protection Act

Recently we were presented with a query as to whether a dispute can be referred to a Consumer Court even if the warranty terms for the product under dispute contains the clause “all dispute arising between parties shall be subject to Arbitration Act”. Section 3 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 states as follows: “Act not …

Continue reading

Oriental Insurance directed to pay compensation in mediclaim

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2003 (From the order dated 03.06.2003 in Appeal No. 169/03 of the State Commission, Jharkhand) ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY ……… Petitioner New Delhi – 110001 Smt. Parkash Devi ……..Respondent Jharkhand BEFORE: HON’BLE DR.P.D. SHENOY, PRESIDING MEMBER HON’BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA, MEMBER Order Dated the …

Continue reading

Airtel & Star Plus TV directed to pay damages on KBC’s ‘Har Seat Hot Seat’ contest

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 83 OF 2007 Society of Catalysts, N – 130, Panchshila Park, New Delhi – 110 017 Complainant versus 1. Star Plus TV 2. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Opposite Parties BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. B. SHAH, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. RAJYALAKSHMI RAO, MEMBER HON’BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA, MEMBER Relevant …

Continue reading

Hello Consumers!

Do you have a consumer complaint? Why wait? Submit your complaint using our Post Complaints box. You will hear from us soon.

error: Content is protected !!